Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
Latest Threads |
Build 2.00 - 2.0.0.1850 v...
Forum: Help with Video Gear
Last Post: Mister T
11-13-2024, 02:15 PM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 904
|
Problems with latest Rele...
Forum: Help with Live Jamming Sessions
Last Post: B.J. van Hoek
10-18-2024, 09:44 AM
» Replies: 6
» Views: 1,445
|
Low audio on mic only
Forum: Help with Audio Gear
Last Post: Dimitri Muskens
10-09-2024, 01:52 PM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 645
|
High jitter with new rele...
Forum: Help with Audio Gear
Last Post: stewbow
09-23-2024, 08:31 PM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 423
|
Cannot hear plug in
Forum: Help with Audio Effects Plugins
Last Post: Francis
09-23-2024, 01:13 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 529
|
Can't hear sound post plu...
Forum: Help with Audio Gear
Last Post: Francis
09-22-2024, 11:41 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 220
|
Mac Plug In Issue?
Forum: Help with Mac Client Problems
Last Post: Francis
09-22-2024, 11:40 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 701
|
No Updates in More Than a...
Forum: Help with Live Jamming Sessions
Last Post: B.J. van Hoek
09-13-2024, 01:15 PM
» Replies: 28
» Views: 35,166
|
Linux Application
Forum: New Feature Requests
Last Post: tadonic
09-11-2024, 09:46 PM
» Replies: 47
» Views: 103,966
|
Experiences in Latency wi...
Forum: Help with Network Gear
Last Post: LASongwriter
09-02-2024, 08:20 AM
» Replies: 3
» Views: 6,729
|
|
|
Jamhub? |
Posted by: surfinggrrrl - 05-11-2020, 06:52 PM - Forum: Help with Live Jamming Sessions
- Replies (1)
|
|
HI
Is anyone here familiar with a Jamhub? This is a hub with several outputs/inputs and controls, designed so band members can practice
in silence, with headphones. Its a great tool for apartment dwellers so you don't disturb the neighbors.
We want to use the Jamhub with JamKazam and connect with musicians online. Will the Jamhub work as an audio interface? It does have recording capabilities, however we haven't tried to record. We do not have a separate audio interface. Jamhub support is sketchy, so I thought I would ask here.
Thanks
BA
|
|
|
Recorded Tracks not synchronised |
Posted by: Johannes - 05-11-2020, 03:38 PM - Forum: Miscellaneous
- Replies (51)
|
|
I noticed that the individual tracks of a recording are not in sync. We made a recording of our session this morning, just two of us. I started the recording, everything uploaded fine, all bars are green. The final mix is still queued but that seems a "feature". I don't need it, I will do the mixing myself, so I loaded the tracks into the daw, but they are not in sync, so I had to move one by approximately 200 ms.
I assume this is the time it takes from my "record" command, until the remote party's JamKazam start recording locally. It is not really a problem, but I would like to know exactly how much I have to compensate the offset, and not guess. Any tipps?
It seems that once I have adjusted the offset, everything is fine from start to end.
|
|
|
Sample Rate set to 48, records at 44.1 |
Posted by: Johannes - 05-11-2020, 03:23 PM - Forum: Help with Audio Gear
- Replies (3)
|
|
Hi,
we had great success this morning rehearsing classical music over the internet from Berlin to St.Gallen, fantastic!
We both had our interfaces set to 48kHz sampling rate, however, when I looked at the files from a test recording, I notice they are at 44.1kHz!
Question: Does JK just adjust the setting to 44.1 anyway? My MOTU certainly always showed 48kHz on the diplay.
Or does it convert the rate at some stage, and at which stage does this happen?
We were going to make some videos, so we would prefer to record at 48kHz, is that possible? If not, I guess it is better to set the interfaces to 44.1 from the start.
A bit of a mystery to me.
Thanks, Johannes
|
|
|
Block function must come back! - Quickly! - Need it! |
Posted by: Hans Peter Augustesen - 05-11-2020, 03:01 PM - Forum: Miscellaneous
- Replies (12)
|
|
Block function in sessions must come back! - Quickly! - Need it!
No motivation should be needed for that
It just must be there - soon!
Motivation - for Prinz Knut
Otherwise, I (and others, for that matter) cannot use this approach:
"Semi OPEN SESSION
People with bad internet connection (crackling, sound breaking up und so weiter) may not be allowed to stay.
If I regard a connection too crappy and so I will kick the person out - maybe without further notice.
People with too high latency in relation to me or others may also be kicked out in the same maner.
The same for people that dont respond to charges".
|
|
|
Metronome issue |
Posted by: Mobike - 05-11-2020, 03:01 PM - Forum: New Feature Requests
- Replies (3)
|
|
I like the metronome and believe, if used properly, it is very helpful to keep players in sync as much as possible. Jamming yesterday with a fellow in Paris, France (I'm in Oregon) and we played along together nicely.
Anyway, as we were using the metronome it would stop and the metronome window close when someone joined the session.
Obviously, I would like for that not to happen but also would like that only the person who opened the metronome could close it. Those that may not want to listen to it could mute it but not accidentally (or otherwise) make it go away for everyone.
Thanks.
|
|
|
New and not Tech savvy |
Posted by: cfbwey - 05-11-2020, 12:00 PM - Forum: Help with Audio Gear
- Replies (3)
|
|
Hi I'm new to online sessions and also new to using tech with music. I play Bodhran and various stringed instruments, I have a dynamic Yoga mic, Berhinger Xenyx 502. My PC has SSD is fast I have the option for using Linux or Windows 10 and I have a webcam that takes up a USB port and audio input separately. I also have a Bandlab Link analogue. I can set up Jamkazam upstairs from my computer using just the webcam and onboard mic but the latency is about 40ms which is far too long making me very unpopular as the drummer. I can improve on that by running a very long line through the house upstairs direct from my router but Windows settings only give me the option for a webcam or a mic? So the other day I set up downstairs on a cheap laptop, with on board camera, using my beringer and microphone and headphones watched all the videos, altered all the settings accordingly all was working fine in the test session but the minute I join the other musicians all I got was ear bleeding feedback I had to turn all the setting on the mixer down to virtually nothing. I couldn't hear them but they could not hear me swearing like a tropper. I've been thinking of getting a condenser mic that maybe I could use with the Bandlab link on my PC any thoughts?
|
|
|
Loopback Test |
Posted by: RichardRKenyon@msn.com - 05-11-2020, 05:29 AM - Forum: Help with Audio Gear
- Replies (4)
|
|
I'm a JB newbie trying to make the initial latency test using a Behringer UM2 interface. To make the loopback test do I need to plug a cable between the headphone jack and the Inst2 jack? I'm using a condenser mic input. Behringer suggests an ASIO4ALL driver for their UM2.
|
|
|
Using Powerline adapters |
Posted by: rwjearle - 05-11-2020, 12:13 AM - Forum: Help with Network Gear
- Replies (1)
|
|
As I can't get within 100 feet of my router, I've been using D-Link AV2000 powerline adapters, which provide bandwidth of up to 2 Gbps. These have worked for me before with fantastic results, but tonight I went to join a jam session and I got messages that nobody could receive packets from me (I'm not really sure what that means), and it suggested that I run the Network Test. When I did, the test seemed to think that I was using a WiFi connection. I ignored it, ran the test anyway, and then it timed out.
Has anyone else used powerline adapters? What is your impression of them for use with JamKazam? Do you think this would have anything to do with the network test timing out?
Any help is greatly appreciated!
Thanks!
Bob Earle
|
|
|
|