| Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
| Latest Threads |
Don't settle for virtual
Forum: Miscellaneous
Last Post: jamaroney
09-17-2026, 02:22 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 82
|
Forced to update - "Unabl...
Forum: Help with Mac Client Problems
Last Post: backinterrapin
07-08-2026, 05:51 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 877
|
NOT DOWNLOADING!
Forum: Help with JamTracks
Last Post: souzaj@sbcglobal.net
05-29-2026, 04:07 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 1,256
|
Jam Track not saving cust...
Forum: Help with JamTracks
Last Post: terry@terrywall.com
05-25-2026, 02:14 PM
» Replies: 4
» Views: 13,114
|
Subscription question - g...
Forum: Miscellaneous
Last Post: Dimitri Muskens
05-21-2026, 07:59 PM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 1,594
|
MacOS 26 Tahoe Issues?
Forum: Help with Mac Client Problems
Last Post: Dimitri Muskens
01-25-2026, 05:30 PM
» Replies: 4
» Views: 8,874
|
webcam tests OK, but blac...
Forum: Help with Video Gear
Last Post: GR3
01-21-2026, 12:21 AM
» Replies: 6
» Views: 23,692
|
How to set buffer size on...
Forum: Help with Audio Gear
Last Post: Imjusta
12-02-2025, 05:59 AM
» Replies: 23
» Views: 95,516
|
finding a specific person
Forum: Miscellaneous
Last Post: Dimitri Muskens
09-22-2025, 10:12 PM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 4,264
|
List of Audio Interfaces
Forum: Help with Audio Gear
Last Post: Way San
08-21-2025, 08:11 AM
» Replies: 205
» Views: 899,023
|
|
|
| Problems with Behringer X1204 - Device not found |
|
Posted by: Gerald - 11-19-2020, 09:45 PM - Forum: Help with Audio Gear
- Replies (3)
|
 |
I have some problems getting startet with my Berhinger X1204 Mixer (which is listed as good working).
The mixer is connected via USB to my PC(Win 10) and works properly with different audio software. So I expected, Jamkazam would recognize it without any problem.
But: Selectinh the "Auto Device configuration" it shows only the choice between Behringer UMC204 or UMC204HD, which I don´t have, and Jamkazam asks for the driver. I installed the driver, but then Jamkazam shows that it can´t find the device. No wonder, because I have a X1204. 
In the sound options menu I changed Jamkazam from "standard" to my Behringer X1204, but without success. What can I do? Would be really happy to get it working.
Thanks for your help!
Gerald
|
|
|
|
| USB to Ethernet Adapters |
|
Posted by: ribick - 11-19-2020, 04:55 PM - Forum: Help with Live Jamming Sessions
- Replies (3)
|
 |
Hi All:
First time poster here. I did try to search the forum first, but my lack of skills here may have found me at a loss in finding the answer to this question despite its presence here. I'm sorry if that is the case.
Given the way JamKazam is designed with respect to attempts at eliminating as much latency as possible, I completely understand the recommended use of a wired cable connections to the internet versus WiFi when using JamKazam.
The problem for me is that PC laptop manufacturers, in their effort to make designs thinner, seem to be doing away with providing an ethernet (i.e. RJ45) port standard.
Accordingly, I was wondering if anyone could speak to their ability to use, for example, USB adapters that provide an RJ45 female plug and the potential for latency that such, I've read, slower hard wired connections provide.
It's my understanding that even USB 3.0 ports not only don't compare to ethernet speeds, but that there is more that needs to go on within the machine to translate signals using USB than with an ethernet port, on top of what I've read about how USB ports within a PC compete with each other for a processor's "attention" ...certainly a relevant concern given that we run JamKazam microphones through USB ports as well.
Any guidance/success stories--other techniques that people have used to deal with this issue would be greatly appreciated, and what type of USB port (e.g. USB, USB 2, USB 3) was involved. This BTW is not a Mac based question where things like Thunderbolt ports come into play.
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
| Any microwave broadband versus fibre issues? |
|
Posted by: mheeley.gm@gmail.com - 11-19-2020, 02:04 PM - Forum: Miscellaneous
- Replies (8)
|
 |
The problems we're getting with my 3-person local (within 10km) sessions seem to be more intense since 2 weeks ago - we would never complain about the level of lag (latency) or jitter (sound quality errors) until then.
Looking at the performance dashboards with this lower general performance, it seems clear that my broadband leg (which arrives via microwave to my chimney) is causing bad results on my sending legs to the two others and on the receiving legs from them both. This may have been the relative qualities of links previously but the effect on the session was able to be ignored previously.
Anyone out there have a similar problem apparently caused by microwave broadband, or know any theoretical reason for problems, or anyone else who gets this? All three of us have great kit and broadband downlink and uplink speeds, and always use wired connections direct from the router RJ45 connector.
|
|
|
|
| Participants volume in session unmanageable |
|
Posted by: jazzandlatin - 11-19-2020, 09:12 AM - Forum: Miscellaneous
- Replies (3)
|
 |
Hi
Hope you can help me understand how can following can happen :
I was in a session yesterday with 5 other users who are in Germany (i am in France) and i wasn't able to lower/increase/mute the volume of 2 of them under Personal Mix
Also could you please explain the difference in a session of latency in personal mix versus latency in audio inputs
Thanks in advance !
Didier
|
|
|
|
| Audio distortion (overdrive) |
|
Posted by: Harpo S - 11-16-2020, 07:42 PM - Forum: Help with Live Jamming Sessions
- Replies (1)
|
 |
I've been using JamKazam successfully for 8 months. Today it seems totally broken (not sure if its the new sw load that was pushed out).
As soon as I start a session in JamKazam (even a private session) my audio becomes severely distorted - as if overdriving the channel.
Equipment:
Alessis multi mix 4 USB mixer and a microphone.
Wired ethernet to router.
Fiber interent service.
Tried various JamKazam mix levels and can't make it go away (without reducing audio to zero).
Any ideas?
Allan
|
|
|
|
| Should I worry about buffer bloat? |
|
Posted by: carvinae185@gmail.com - 11-15-2020, 09:29 PM - Forum: Help with Network Gear
- Replies (4)
|
 |
When I run the DSL reports speed test I get a grade of D for buffer bloat ( centurylink DSL 40 up, 5 down ). The buffer bloat is only on upload and if I configure the speed test to limit things to 3 mbps the bloat goes away.
Since we have a few ways to limit/throttle bandwidth etc in the Jamkazam app, should I even worry about buffer bloat being caused by Jamkazam outgoing/transmitted data?
In my case I usually have exclusive use of our internet connection during JK sessions. Hard wired of course. Our jams are probably 75-80% successful with everybody within 75 miles of eachother. I seem to get good latency and reasonable jitter, but want to do all I can with the gear I have.
Was even considering a smart/managed gaming switch so I could rate limit ( throttle ) my JK connection, keeping it below any buffer bloat territory.
|
|
|
|
|