• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Buffer bloat...sqm qos
#1
So far, with just two users, our JK sessions are fine.   I do see in speed tests that bufferbloat is bad on uploads, but I'm not sure my Centurylink DSL modem/router has QOS ( quality of service ) that's all that configurable.

DSLReports/speedtest results


http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/64914973


Attached Files Thumbnail(s)
   
Using Line 6 Helix or Roland Session Mixer as audio interface
  Reply
#2
(07-19-2020, 01:16 PM)carvinae185@gmail.com Wrote: So far, with just two users, our JK sessions are fine.   I do see in speed tests that bufferbloat is bad on uploads, but I'm not sure my Centurylink DSL modem/router has QOS ( quality of service ) that's all that configurable.

DSLReports/speedtest results


http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/64914973
I've read that in general you should not implement QOS in a home based router as it's likely not very robustly written and could actually cause additional latency.
Also, DSL-based Internet service has poor latency right out of the gate. I'm using that myself and it's marginal at best. If you've got a better choice take it (either fiber or cable). If not, you'll have to wait until JK implements the new audio relay service which they've promised will lower latency and bandwidth requirements.
  Reply
#3
(07-19-2020, 09:54 PM)StuartR Wrote:
(07-19-2020, 01:16 PM)carvinae185@gmail.com Wrote: So far, with just two users, our JK sessions are fine.   I do see in speed tests that bufferbloat is bad on uploads, but I'm not sure my Centurylink DSL modem/router has QOS ( quality of service ) that's all that configurable.

DSLReports/speedtest results


http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/64914973
I've read that in general you should not implement QOS in a home based router as it's likely not very robustly written and could actually cause additional latency.
Also, DSL-based Internet service has poor latency right out of the gate. I'm using that myself and it's marginal at best. If you've got a better choice take it (either fiber or cable). If not, you'll have to wait until JK implements the new audio relay service which they've promised will lower latency and bandwidth requirements.



Unfortunately that's all that's available here.
Using Line 6 Helix or Roland Session Mixer as audio interface
  Reply
#4
(07-19-2020, 10:13 PM)carvinae185@gmail.com Wrote:
(07-19-2020, 09:54 PM)StuartR Wrote:
(07-19-2020, 01:16 PM)carvinae185@gmail.com Wrote: So far, with just two users, our JK sessions are fine.   I do see in speed tests that bufferbloat is bad on uploads, but I'm not sure my Centurylink DSL modem/router has QOS ( quality of service ) that's all that configurable.

DSLReports/speedtest results


http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/64914973
I've read that in general you should not implement QOS in a home based router as it's likely not very robustly written and could actually cause additional latency.
Also, DSL-based Internet service has poor latency right out of the gate. I'm using that myself and it's marginal at best. If you've got a better choice take it (either fiber or cable). If not, you'll have to wait until JK implements the new audio relay service which they've promised will lower latency and bandwidth requirements.



Unfortunately that's all that's available here.

What is the "audio relay service"?
Using Line 6 Helix or Roland Session Mixer as audio interface
  Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)