+- JamKazam Forums (https://forum.jamkazam.com)
+-- Forum: Jamkazam Forums (https://forum.jamkazam.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Help with Network Gear (https://forum.jamkazam.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=3)
+--- Thread: Buffer bloat...sqm qos (/showthread.php?tid=1343)
Buffer bloat...sqm qos - carvinae185@gmail.com - 07-19-2020
So far, with just two users, our JK sessions are fine. I do see in speed tests that bufferbloat is bad on uploads, but I'm not sure my Centurylink DSL modem/router has QOS ( quality of service ) that's all that configurable.
DSLReports/speedtest results
http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/64914973
RE: Buffer bloat...sqm qos - StuartR - 07-19-2020
(07-19-2020, 01:16 PM)carvinae185@gmail.com Wrote: So far, with just two users, our JK sessions are fine. I do see in speed tests that bufferbloat is bad on uploads, but I'm not sure my Centurylink DSL modem/router has QOS ( quality of service ) that's all that configurable.I've read that in general you should not implement QOS in a home based router as it's likely not very robustly written and could actually cause additional latency.
DSLReports/speedtest results
http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/64914973
Also, DSL-based Internet service has poor latency right out of the gate. I'm using that myself and it's marginal at best. If you've got a better choice take it (either fiber or cable). If not, you'll have to wait until JK implements the new audio relay service which they've promised will lower latency and bandwidth requirements.
RE: Buffer bloat...sqm qos - carvinae185@gmail.com - 07-19-2020
(07-19-2020, 09:54 PM)StuartR Wrote:(07-19-2020, 01:16 PM)carvinae185@gmail.com Wrote: So far, with just two users, our JK sessions are fine. I do see in speed tests that bufferbloat is bad on uploads, but I'm not sure my Centurylink DSL modem/router has QOS ( quality of service ) that's all that configurable.I've read that in general you should not implement QOS in a home based router as it's likely not very robustly written and could actually cause additional latency.
DSLReports/speedtest results
http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/64914973
Also, DSL-based Internet service has poor latency right out of the gate. I'm using that myself and it's marginal at best. If you've got a better choice take it (either fiber or cable). If not, you'll have to wait until JK implements the new audio relay service which they've promised will lower latency and bandwidth requirements.
Unfortunately that's all that's available here.
RE: Buffer bloat...sqm qos - carvinae185@gmail.com - 11-15-2020
(07-19-2020, 10:13 PM)carvinae185@gmail.com Wrote:(07-19-2020, 09:54 PM)StuartR Wrote:(07-19-2020, 01:16 PM)carvinae185@gmail.com Wrote: So far, with just two users, our JK sessions are fine. I do see in speed tests that bufferbloat is bad on uploads, but I'm not sure my Centurylink DSL modem/router has QOS ( quality of service ) that's all that configurable.I've read that in general you should not implement QOS in a home based router as it's likely not very robustly written and could actually cause additional latency.
DSLReports/speedtest results
http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/64914973
Also, DSL-based Internet service has poor latency right out of the gate. I'm using that myself and it's marginal at best. If you've got a better choice take it (either fiber or cable). If not, you'll have to wait until JK implements the new audio relay service which they've promised will lower latency and bandwidth requirements.
Unfortunately that's all that's available here.
What is the "audio relay service"?