Is there a reason for insisting on a wired connection other than speed? My wireless speed is 140 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up. Shouldn't that be fast enough?
|
Wireless versus wired connection
|
04-03-2020, 06:31 PM
I think it is to do with jitter introduced by the WiFi step - physical ethernet connections have a very steady clock.
Mind you, I just bought and plugged in a USB RJ45 adapter that my computer uses, but which JamKazam's network test feature refuses to recognise. Oh well... 
04-03-2020, 06:34 PM
(This post was last modified: 04-03-2020, 06:39 PM by Hans Peter Augustesen.)
(04-03-2020, 06:31 PM)ChaoticMike Wrote: I think it is to do with jitter introduced by the WiFi step - physical ethernet connections have a very steady clock.USB RJ45 adapter is only working in a USB3-port - not USB2 (04-03-2020, 04:51 PM)yosh01 Wrote: Is there a reason for insisting on a wired connection other than speed? My wireless speed is 140 Mbps down and 20 Mbps up. Shouldn't that be fast enough?Wireless is not suited for low-latency connections. 20 Mbps upload should be enough Upload is more important than download Very crucial is the so called PING time - you can test that, in different ways |
Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)