09-12-2020, 10:26 PM
Why do you suppose that JK forces the buffer size to twice the sample rate when the frame size is 1ms? I would expect them to be the same.
If I set the sample rate to 48, it forces the buffer size to 96, and if I set the sample rate to 96, it forces the buffer size to 192.
The 96/192 combination does get me a latency of 7.0, but not back to the 5.0 I was getting previously.
If I set the sample rate to 48, it forces the buffer size to 96, and if I set the sample rate to 96, it forces the buffer size to 192.
The 96/192 combination does get me a latency of 7.0, but not back to the 5.0 I was getting previously.