• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Distributed JamKazam Servers (Host) to improve performance
#4
If JamKazam was not peer-to-peer - and the audio and video should pass through the server(s) in Texas, USA, the total latency to my JamKazam-friend 60 miles away (in Denmark, that is) would be about 200 milliseconds. Instead of the about 22 milliseconds it is now
  Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Distributed JamKazam Servers (Host) to improve performance - by Hans Peter Augustesen - 06-21-2020, 12:41 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)