04-23-2020, 03:06 PM
(This post was last modified: 04-23-2020, 03:22 PM by Hans Peter Augustesen.)
Fiber is NOT better than "old" copper - for JamKazam
I firmly believe.
From search on the WEB:
"Is fiber better than copper?
The Difference Between Fiber and Copper
Underlying technologies cause the bandwidth gap between fiber and copper. ...
Copper uses electrons for data transmission, while fiber uses photons.
Light is faster than electrical pulses, so fiber can transmit more bits of data per second and offer higher bandwidth. 23. jan. 2019""
"... more bits of data per second and offer higher bandwidth ..."!?
Nothing about PING - PING is very crucial.
PING for fiber is NOT better than for copper. In short
Of course - one need to find better documentation for that claim.
Maybe I can do that
Now there are at least two threads about excactly the same topic.
It is confusing - not good.
Now one had to post the same message different places.
In fact - it is a total waste and crazy
I firmly believe.
From search on the WEB:
"Is fiber better than copper?
The Difference Between Fiber and Copper
Underlying technologies cause the bandwidth gap between fiber and copper. ...
Copper uses electrons for data transmission, while fiber uses photons.
Light is faster than electrical pulses, so fiber can transmit more bits of data per second and offer higher bandwidth. 23. jan. 2019""
"... more bits of data per second and offer higher bandwidth ..."!?
Nothing about PING - PING is very crucial.
PING for fiber is NOT better than for copper. In short
Of course - one need to find better documentation for that claim.
Maybe I can do that
Now there are at least two threads about excactly the same topic.
It is confusing - not good.
Now one had to post the same message different places.
In fact - it is a total waste and crazy