• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Is JK Peer-to-Peer or server based?
#1
Just curious, are the individual clients doing the heavy lifting when using JamKazam or is this a server-based architecture? 

We've been having quite a bit of success setting up sessions between southern California and Colorado, with latencies around 40ms. Amazing!
  Reply
#2
the heavy lifting is based around your computer, audio gear and internet speed (and stability).
  Reply
#3
(03-28-2020, 11:54 PM)Seisiuneer Wrote: Just curious, are the individual clients doing the heavy lifting when using JamKazam or is this a server-based architecture? 

We've been having quite a bit of success setting up sessions between southern California and Colorado, with latencies around 40ms. Amazing!
"First of all, the audio is routed peer-to-peer between musicians in a session. The audio does not run through JamKazam servers. So the location of our servers is not actually relevant to your latency at all"
[...]
"Best,

David"

David Wilson is CEO of JamKazam
from >http://forum.cakewalk.com/Anything-like-Jamkazam-out-there-m3289696.aspx
  Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)