|
Frame size impact on latency
|
 
JK frame size.pdf (Size: 62.25 KB / Downloads: 9)
So, not really understanding how frame size impacts latency, I did a test - results attached. I'm thinking that the inability to "set" the buffer size and keep it when resyncing is related to Jamkazam, not the interface I am using. Can anyone out there shed any light on this? Or replicate the test with another interface?
09-28-2020, 11:11 PM
(09-28-2020, 08:14 PM)Terles Wrote: So, not really understanding how frame size impacts latency, I did a test - results attached. I'm thinking that the inability to "set" the buffer size and keep it when resyncing is related to Jamkazam, not the interface I am using. Can anyone out there shed any light on this? Or replicate the test with another interface?>>> Although the exact numbers will differ, this is the same for everybody and any interface/sound card. Has been discussed a lot already. It's just math, not a lot to understand. Go with your lowest numbers and just play. That's what JKZ is for.
09-29-2020, 12:35 PM
(09-28-2020, 11:11 PM)Dimitri Muskens True, but doesn\t explain frame size, nor why the buffer gets reset to some default on resync for all except for the 9600/2.5 frame size setting. Just my curious nature, I guess...lol Wrote:(09-28-2020, 08:14 PM)Terles Wrote: So, not really understanding how frame size impacts latency, I did a test - results attached. I'm thinking that the inability to "set" the buffer size and keep it when resyncing is related to Jamkazam, not the interface I am using. Can anyone out there shed any light on this? Or replicate the test with another interface?>>> |
