+- JamKazam Forums (https://forum.jamkazam.com)
+-- Forum: Jamkazam Forums (https://forum.jamkazam.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: JamBlaster (https://forum.jamkazam.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=15)
+--- Thread: JamBlaster support is discontinued (per an email from Jamkazam support) (/showthread.php?tid=642)
Pages:
1
2
RE: JamBlaster support is discontinued (per an email from Jamkazam support) - rfblackburn - 08-22-2020
I'm new to JK and was hoping the JamBlaster would be a good solution for my students. Disappointing to see the rescinding of support for it. I saw some were getting great latency times with the Behringer umc404HD. I don't need anything that sophisticated for what I do? Any suggestions as to a less complex AI that might get good latency results?
Thanks in advance
RE: JamBlaster support is discontinued (per an email from Jamkazam support) - Rex - 08-27-2020
Re "I saw some were getting great latency times with the Behringer umc404HD" .
I agree it is possible to get good latency without resorting to JamBlaster. To my mind the value of the JamBlaster is it's ease of use for non-technical people. I suspect there are a lot of musicians out there who would use Jamkazam (or Jamulus) but are put off because it is too complicated to set-up/use.
RE: JamBlaster support is discontinued (per an email from Jamkazam support) - joe@joebear.net - 01-22-2021
Grr. Irritated. Apparently absolutely useless purchase.
People say it can be used as a standard interface -- how? It has USB A ports, not USB B.
RE: JamBlaster support is discontinued (per an email from Jamkazam support) - Zlartibartfast - 01-24-2022
this thread should be a sticky, FAQ, or whatever
Sorry folks, but the internet is full of lies and one of them is that the Jamblaster will work as an audio interface for a PC (Mac/Linux/Windoze/POSIX/etc).
It Never did, It Never will.
Hopefully soon this particular scam will die off (to be replaced by something else, I'm sure)